Been there, done that. If you want to open yourself up for an honest critique of your images, we could do that again.
April 2, 2023
284
-
Well, you certainly do a lot of walking but nearly every time you talk you trip over yourself with the nonsense you mostly post.
-
Id rather pull a gear box out of an old car rather knowing where the iron ore came from to make the crank. im sure my way would get the car running faster than yours 😁
-
Sometimes I can't even begin to fathom how your brain works, if that's the right word for it.
-
there is no honest critique, seen it all before . how can someone critique an image honestly when they cant produce an image close to them. i never critique an image unless i have a comparison to show what to do for a better image. its like shooting dance images most dont even know how a foot should be turned out .
-
It's very easy to see what he does. When he has been proven wrong and has run out of arguments to try to justify his opinions, he uses a scatter gun approach to going off on fairy tale tangents to try to disguise his lack of understanding of basic photography concepts.
-
when you can build your own $500,000 yacht from scratch that takes 8000 hours and i mean everything and then sail for 70,000 miles you might start to understand.
you think taking an image is a challenge 🙄 -
To summarise all that, it means you are scared.
-
Yep another fairy tale tangent as described earlier.
-
end of discussion.
-
That article confirms what I and many others having been saying.
That article says: "This means that adjusting the setting to ISO200 lets you shoot with the same brightness as ISO100 even in half the amount of light."
which is exactly what I have been posting earlier.
For a given scene lighting:
f/8, 1/400s, ISO 200
and
f/8, 1/200s, ISO 100
will output the same image lightness (or brightness if you like) but the ISO 200 shot will have had only 1/2 the exposure* of the ISO 100 shot and so the ISO 200 shot will have more visible noise than the ISO 100 shot.
The sensor's sensitivity had not changed at all by changing the ISO setting.
ISO does not affect the sensor's sensitivity because for a given scene lighting, aperture and shutter speed the number of photons a sensor's pixel/photosite sees at ISO 100 will be the same as the number of photons seen with ISO 6400. Raising ISO does not enable the sensor to somehow 'suck' in more photons/light from the scene. It will just make the same amount of noise more visible.
* exposure - amount of light that struck the sensor per unit area while the shutter was open
** optimal exposure - the maximum exposure* within dof and motion blur requirements without clipping important highlights.
*** under exposed - more exposure* could have been added with the DOF and blur constraints still being met without clipping important highlights. -
the penny has dropped "Why are my photos noisy" your camera has taken on your personality 🤣😂🤣 its possessed. 😈
-
Another fairy tale tangent as described earlier.
-
has anyone disputed that ? now confirm the rest.
-
You have because you believe exposure is how light or dark an image looks on the medium the image is being viewed on.
-
You two still at it? Good god....
-
i only push the go to last post button, what's before that is old news. we need threaded view, flat view does my head in. may be that's my problem 😵🥴
-
noooOOOh.......I think there is more to it than that 🙂