I kinda figured the results would be as such. Post away. I tried to find a different set of ideas from each image, but the technique is close to the same on all of them. My biggest thought was would any sensor make any difference. I doubted it, but couldn't hurt to check. No need for extra effort. What you posted tells me all I really need to know. It's not going to work a miracle and it struggles, which is pretty much what I expected.
Ever seen an AI image that looks like it was shot at 3200 or higher ISO? I haven't. It's more a reactionary thought to go in the opposite direction of conventional wisdom, just to prove a point. "This is a digital photograph of a Pipe" if you will. Alas, as you point out, its gonna kill details and I'm not sure I have the right tools to achieve what I'm going for. More experimenting is required.
Thanks for your help.