• April 23, 2023, 7:45 a.m.

    That is a problem that we all have. There is so much material on the web, from supposedly authoritative sources on the subject of exposure which is just wrong. Then there is a large group of unknowing photographers that unwittingly absorb that information and as a result end up with a mental model of photography that simply doesn't work. Then there's another group of photographers that wrongly believe themselves to be knowledgable. propagate the errors and even go as far as to try to defend the errors from the people trying to help beginner photographers onto a path which will allow their understanding to grow.

    That would be you.

    Obviously the exposure is controlled by the luminous energy over the exposure time. In the case of a long exposure with a flash in the middle, the light from the flash adds to the exposure. The extent to which the shutter or the flash dominate the resulting exposure depends on the relative light power of them. It's not a problem with the definition of exposure, it's a problem with exposure not being as simple and obvious as trianglists would like to pretend (mainly because they don't have enough understanding to even grasp the basics, yet alone the more involved situations). And I should note there, unless anyone gets hot under the collar, I'm not referring to any individual there, only a hypothetical group of people that I call 'trianglists' who have unfortunately based their understanding of photography on the triangle and as a result understand very little.

    But not in direct relation to the ISO setting. On a car the accelerator/throttle control controls the throttle. On a modern car it will also affect the ignition timing, the mixture and possibly also the valve timing and the induction tract length. It would not be useful to tell learner drivers that the accelerator was an ignition timing control to the exclusion of it major function.

    Absolutely and completely incorrect. Now your turn to dooooo some homework Try reading up about mic sensitivity.

    Sort out your knowledge of how microphones work before lecturing others to try to get them to adopt your faulty ideas of how sensors work.

  • Members 2365 posts
    April 23, 2023, 7:50 a.m.

    my understanding of microphones is very accurate I've just set my daughter up with a complete recording studio . i think i know a little more about recording live music than you . next your going to tell me your a qualified sound engineer like my daughter. have you even played with complex recording studio software and mix a track with 7 instruments in a studio ? or even know how to correctly stereo record an acoustic guitar ?

  • Members 4254 posts
    April 23, 2023, 7:59 a.m.

    You haven't posted anything that suggests that is even remotely true.

  • Members 2365 posts
    April 23, 2023, 8:01 a.m.

    child.
    the young lady in the back lit photo i posted is my daughter .

  • Members 4254 posts
    April 23, 2023, 8:04 a.m.

    Maybe she, maybe she isn't. It's irrelevant because I cannot verify who took the photo and it certainly doesn't prove you know much about sound recording.

  • Members 360 posts
    April 23, 2023, 8:08 a.m.

    You guys are spamming the forum very successfully now. 🤦

  • April 23, 2023, 8:20 a.m.

    Just because you say it is doesn't make it so. You clearly know very little about microphones at all.

    Which means nothing at all - just that you have the cash available and can read catalogues.

    Very possibly, but you know .... all about microphones.

  • Members 2365 posts
    April 23, 2023, 8:21 a.m.

    how ? by quoting articles from all the major camera manufacturer's ? do you really think ALL of them are wrong including Sony ? they make the majority of sensors.

  • April 23, 2023, 8:21 a.m.

    Look up the definition of 'spam' ;-)

  • Members 96 posts
    April 23, 2023, 8:23 a.m.

    They kind of remind me of the classic phrase "get a room". Labeling it "D & D" might confuse Dungeons and Dragons players though.

  • Members 4254 posts
    April 23, 2023, 8:24 a.m.
  • Members 2365 posts
    April 23, 2023, 8:27 a.m.

    when you spend $500 on a single microphone 5 X over your start to figure it out LOL. and then buy matched pairs for certain recording jobs. I can tell you its great fun . have ever played with the live wireless mixing panels walking around a live venue ? adjusting levels to suit the acoustics ?

  • April 23, 2023, 8:29 a.m.

    Just because you spend a lot of money doesn't mean that you know anything - in fact generally the opposite.

  • Members 4254 posts
    April 23, 2023, 8:30 a.m.

    So what? This is not a music forum. You clearly have very little understanding of the basic photography 101 concepts and when your lack of knowledge is shown up you try to deflect to music analogies which are not applicable.

  • April 23, 2023, 8:31 a.m.

    The room has cameras so that everyone can enjoy the fun of two-on-one action.

  • April 23, 2023, 8:32 a.m.

    They are directly applicable. It's just that his knowledge of the underlying theory of sound reproduction is at about the same level as his knowledge of the underlying theory of photography.

  • Members 2365 posts
    April 23, 2023, 8:33 a.m.

    yeh like the images i post heh 😁id rather and always have walk the walk. not talk the talk 😎

  • April 23, 2023, 8:36 a.m.

    Been there, done that. If you want to open yourself up for an honest critique of your images, we could do that again.