• Members 70 posts
    April 30, 2023, 1:49 p.m.

    +1...

    In the summer of 2018 Nikon finally released their Z program and joined the upcoming ML camera world.
    I was lucky to try out Nikon Z7 months before availability, and it was a great first ML product at that particular moment, and I sold my D500, D850 & D4 to finance the Z6 + Z7 combo & Z lenses.
    Z6 & Z7' AF was nowhere near D500' AF, but "good enough" compared to other ML options at that time point. ZZ & Z6' AF was sometimes great & sometimes even "fantastic", but unfortunately sometimes (very) frustrating...
    The Z6 & Z7' LCD resolution, slow refresh rate, and movement limitations were other points I didn't like.
    ... But being able to shoot totally silent compared to former Nikon Dslr' machine gun sound, next to the outstanding IQ, unbeaten Nikon DR and all this in a compact, lightweight body, made me love Nikon Z.
    The Z 24-70 F4 (*) is another extremely positive point I'll remember from Nikon Z.
    I was using the Z7 next to my D850 for some weeks and even though Z6 & Z7 do not have the AF potential of D500 or D850, there is no problem capturing moderate action, wildlife action or BIFs with Z6 & Z7...

    But then -2020- Nikon released their second generation Z cameras...
    Thanks to a friendly Nikon representative I had the opportunity to test a Z7II for a couple of hours before release.
    Probably loaded with too high expectations I didn't see ANY AF improvement though and that crippled, low-resolution, non-swivel LCD was still there.
    Selling Z6 &/or Z7 to get Z7II &/or Z6II meant nothing else than burning money.
    I was so disappointed that I canceled my Z7II & Z6II pre-orders.

    On November 29th, 2020, and with no plans whatsoever to change my Z6 & Z7 for something else, ... I had the opportunity to try a Canon R5 from a friend.
    I was simply blown away... I had the feeling I was shooting with a mirrorless D500, autofocusing even faster than D500 and with potentially 20 x 45Mp frames per second.
    The R5 body and button layout please me more than Z and last but not least, the R5' high-resolution swivel LCD is a dream.

    On December 12th I got mine at Audiophil Foto in Aachen-Germany.
    The first 48 hours were pure horror trying to get along with a totally different system and menus. For a moment I was even thinking about returning it…

    On December 20th I started to sell most of my Nikon gear to finance partly my entire brand switch with all glass I need, for fun and for my work...
    I bought my lenses @ Audiophil in Germany and @ Art & Craft in Belgium. Both companies provide exceptional service.

    The lightweight 800mm F11 is a totally unexpected extra, it provides very good IQ and R5 makes it AF about as fast as my nikkor 200-500 did on my D500 & D850, which means fast enough to capture wildlife action in good light.
    R5 is that good.
    Under while I added several RF lenses and a R7 for wildlife and macro. The R7 combined with the RF 100 macro is another homerun by Canon.

    My Nikon -->Canon move was a one-way ticket and Z8 (3-4 years too late) won't make me change my opinion...
    Kindest regards,
    Stany

  • Members 54 posts
    April 30, 2023, 2:39 p.m.

    Is this thread mainly about AF? Is it relevant for those of us who mainly photograph things that don't move (architecture, gardens, landscape, etc.)?

  • Members 21 posts
    April 30, 2023, 4:25 p.m.

    Thanks for your reply Stany. This has totally been my experience as well. The R5 & R7 birds eye autofocus is just amazing! Currently I purchased the RF 1.4 extender and I am using it with the RF 100-400 with the R7. It makes for a very light and capable setup when you don't want the added weight of the R5 and RF 100-500.
    Thank you, Tom

  • Members 9 posts
    April 30, 2023, 4:48 p.m.

    Oh come on! 😊 The Z9 shoots at 60 fps only when shooting JPEGs and in DX crop. If we are to work within limitations of a camera's processing power, the OM-1 also shoots at 120 fps and 240 fps, but that wasn't my point.

    I did not condemn Camera X to praise Camera Y. Every camera has limitations, every system has compromises, and I was simply illustrating that BCG is not as unbiased as someone here had claimed.

  • Members 65 posts
    April 30, 2023, 5:35 p.m.

    [/quote]
    Over the course of a decade, I've only had posts deleted from threads you were involved in. Strange coincidence, don't you think?
    [/quote]
    As I did not do the deleting or see what you wrote it is difficult for me to comment.

    When I occasionally had a sentence deleted I always got an email explaining why.
    Whether you did is probably not a relevant topic for this forum

  • Members 243 posts
    May 1, 2023, 5:02 p.m.

    The way you are going at him here, I am not surprised at all......LOL.

  • May 1, 2023, 5:29 p.m.

    Minor cosmetic change, doesn't constitute a different camera, except making it absurdly less optimal control-wise for the kind of things people will use it for. Hopefully, if they do go that route, it's more like the Zfc than Df - but even then...

  • Members 15 posts
    May 3, 2023, midnight

    I'm a Nikon shooter (among other brands) and it doesn't bother me one bit if someone claims camera x, y, or z is a better camera. I just keep on doing what works for me with what works for me.