well there you go finally the truth is told.

ive just printed an A4 from my new pro 200 and the image quallity is beautiful from the d30. i want one, but none for sale here in AUS 😒

what amazes me as well is photographers are just as blind as musos are deaf 🫣 ive been learning a new song on my new guitar and 2 cords just sounded not quite right, ive spent 2 days looking at all the cord progressions form 20 different people and i was still not happy, but then this morning i have finally nailed the correct cords 😁 never say never if you dont post anything and listern to everyone else your bound to come unstuck, just ask Jim K hows his 10x macro is going with MF 😂 its how i got my perm moderation 🤨 its the same with there extreme macro setups. they all copy each other and they are all wrong, there systems are useless and defy all lodgic, but hey they all think they know better, i just posted my setup to a mod getting into exteme macro, but havnt had a response back, probally because its game changing and very well designed and he doesnt want to start from scratch.

All of that is just your opinions.

pretty safe bet if you ask me 🤔

I was referring to your opinions about Jim K.

Just because you might disagree with him doesn't make what he says wrong.

You were justifiably sandboxed from what I saw.

That's why I would back Jim K against the likes of DonaldB, especially when DonaldB makes unproven claims which are then at best simply his opinions.

i dont take images of other peoples art/work , i create my own content.

Then you should shoot with a single-pixel sensor.

Are you dumb, or just obnoxious?

you should shoot with a phone 😁 it might even power your home they have 200 solar panels 2x the gfx2.

This has no application, whatsoever, to the issue of subdividing a given sensing area into photosites of varying density.

The greyscale? If it is the greyscale you are talking about, that is a matter of glare on the card and conversion levels/contrast settings, and has nothing to do with color filters, noise, or anything that can vary with pixel size, when the exposure is that high. With less total light per patch, and more noise, then the darker patches may all look similar or get lost, no matter what the contrast, gamma, or lightness.

Talk about all your eggs in one basket!

all the test images were taken with controled lighting by DPR i pushed the sample images to expose the darker patches to see what sensor had better tone seperation which is due to more acurate photon charge being recorded. and we can clearly see the larger pixel is by far better . i just processed another sample from DPR sample images. shadow recovery form the 3 meg sensor is amazing and im pushing the jpegs, i always said my FF jpegs can easliy out perform any m43 raw files.

Do you even realize how crazy this argument is, from a mathematical point of view? Essentially what you're saying is that stairs are a better approximation of the side of mountain than a curve is.

That should be the new motto for the GOP. 😂

plot the "stair" in the images and post the graph from several cameras of any era. ive measured some of the patches via Ps eye dropper tool and some go the wrong way 🤔 just post your conclusions via images im sick of armchair mathematicians, they are about as acurate as meteorologist 😁