The rich color and design of the buildings is showcased against the gray featureless sky. Though you could probably bring out more detail in that sky with processing, I am not sure I would do that. The buildings have a stark beauty that could be diminished by having them compete with a lovely sky. The first is my favorite of the set, for its soaring ornate tower.
Well, it looks like Spring is treading lightly there anyway, and as it has here, is quick to retreat when winter pushes back. We are celebrating the beauty of old cities here this week!
I really like this series. Especially the last image - warm refuge against the chill outside. I would have warmed up the color of the lighting a little and included a cup of coffee in the foreground, steam rising! (Just kidding - very nice images).
Interesting series. Winter is still around and not giving up. Plants are really at the mercy of the weather. That frost is adding and taking away, all at the same time.
It's an amazing building with stunning colour that looks great against the pure blue sky.
As a photo however I feel it has a problem. Are we looking at the building or the tourists? The tourists seem more interested in the photographer than the building.
If this was the point you wanted to make (and it might be. If so, there's plenty of irony) then I think the tourists need to be larger.
If a study of the building is what you want, I'd suggests a portrait format crop with the lower edge a little above the tourist's heads, taking in about half of the roof on the right and cutting out the tree on the left.
This is an interesting study of different crops, which, as a series, gives the same mpression of motion.
As a single image, I think the third has the most impact and says it all.
I have just played about with the limited editing possibilities on my phone and have two more suggestions
Ok, Wi-Fi issues, I’ll try to post them later.
Very graphic. The image is very simple but then so is the message on the road. Just do it. We don't know what we are stopping for but the cracked surface gives a feeling of unease suggesting it is a sign that should be obeyed.
Up in the top left is a small detail that distracts from the simplicity. Perhaps remove it?
Viewed large, another possibilty emerges. The leaf. I'm not sure whether this is a monochrome or whether the leaf has a hint of colour? If the leaf was given a little more green, whole new interpretations of the photo become possible.
Right around the world, government buildings of the mid 20s to early 30s use similar figures with similar symbolism. I guess it was a reaction to events in Russia and governments of all persuasions deciding it would be prudent to make a gesture. There's a book to be put together on this.
A suggestion. Arrange them more as a series. The last photo gives something of the whole building. Perhaps start with the complete building and then zoom in on the individual figures. I found each figure a lot more interesting when seen large on its own.
As Chris says. The progression works well. In 2. the old brick walls and black clothing give a backdrop making the snowflakes stand out. The last shot with its warm domesticity and view out onto the street is all the better because we have been out on the street.
It's a color image. I deliberately did not crop out the yellow dividing stripe in the street. Other "real" objects are simply where they were when the shot was taken. Everything about the image is real, especially its imperative.