Images like this tie me in knots. Don't expect a coherent response from me here because it is an area where I am unresolved within myself.
Impressionism is my favourite art style/movement. I could write an extended piece on why this is so. I'm happy for photographs to be impressionistic where the capturing of the image has created the result. For example, as a result of deliberate camera movement or maybe when reflections or fog, or other conditions have created an effect. I don't know how LindaS made the shot. If it was done by applying a filter of some sort to a photo, I get uncomfortable. That kind of manipulation seems counter to the point of impressionism. If it was done (I don't think it was) by photographing a reflection on, say, misted glass, I'm comfortable.
Without much trouble I can find holes and inconsistencies in my argument here.
Irrespective of the above, here, I like the difference between Stella and Me. Me is vague, a suggested shape with enough info to recognize a photographer at work. Me is easily the largest part of the image. Stella needs to be discovered. Relatively small and tucked in a corner. Her warmer hues and position in the corner lines ensure that we will find her. Stella is treated differently. She's sharp and detailed. Conclusion. This is a photograph of a relationship with the photographer. Stella's important in the relationship.