* Wednesday C&C "No Theme" Thread #782 / Revived #003 on 2023 04 19 *

Social commentary. The men have a unity about them. Same size, same clothes,same stride and overlapping each other. Two of them talk together. We can identify them as one group. The black line at the bottom of the wall intersects with the black lines of the suits so we feel there is some connection.Their position has them moving out of the frame. The rest of the image, including the reflections, makes it clear that we are in an art gallery. We feel that the art itself is of no interest whatsoever to the men. There are plenty of conclusions that might be reached.
A statement about art as business.
Or. "We came along to be seen at the opening. The speeches are over and the wine has now run out."

Trying a few different ideas rolled into one here. Would appreciate any thoughts.

It's the kind of shot I need to see many times before I develop thoughts. As it is, I'm struggling find a reason or interpretation of the subject and composition. We have a prominent figure inside an elongated horizontal slice of building and roof line. If the roofline is especially important, I'd have taken more off the sky and really gone for the horizontal aspect.
If the man within the period house setting is important, I'd have gone with the original version that includes a lot more of the old house. The man is still quite prominent.
The roofline itself gets lots of attention in the image as posted. I can't see why and I'll be interested to see how others respond.

What more can I say?
I love (taking and viewing) photos of visitors in museums and art galleries.
There is a kind of "street shooting" to be practiced there: interactions between humans and an interesting environment.
In that respect, this image does not disappoint, although it does the opposite : it shows NON-interaction.
The art is there, but the visitors just breeze through the space, talking and walking clearly faster than would be good for watching the art.
Minnie made good observations, and Mike absolutely nailed a description of the vibe the image projects.

I get a distinct feeling of infinity here.
It looks like a setting for an action set piece in a sci-fi movie about a dystopian future society.

I will confess that I'm finding it hard to like this one once I get past the pretty white flower. The color of the blurred parts is a put off for me, but I have a dislike for purple and magenta so I may not be a fair reviewer on this one. This may be a matter of personal taste, but I found the image more pleasing when I desaturated it and applied a LUT. Then I find I like it quite well and can appreciate the symmetrical blur that becomes part of the composition, leading the eye in a circular pattern around the well defined flower.

I very much like the idea and the limited colors! Cropping to a square gives me more of a feeling of being fully enveloped by the soft foliage.

I don't think the desaturation is an improvement.
The purple hues do not bother me. They create a mournful atmosphere. The flower comes to represent a slice of hope in the midst of grief or mourning.
It is not an upbeat image and the colour treatment is odd (like the church previously), but it forces me to think.
It tells me that realism is not the alpha and omega of photography.
I still would not buy any of the two images to hang on my wall (or accept them as a screensaver on my computer). But they are at least interesting.

Both have a strange, surreal, dreamlike quality.

The second creates the impression of the bottle cap being hurled into the air by a stream of bubbles.

The first reminded me a lot of M.C. Escher, the dutch graphic artist, with his impossible constructions.
The cap seems inside the bottleneck, but simultaneously outside of it.
So Escher or maybe also Möbius.

Both present an odd view and a photograph that is quite different from the kind of realistic documentary photography that I usually prefer.
But like Jim Kasson's guitar, I am intrigued and forced to reconsider my preferences and that is good.

Yup, the background does you no favours.
I don't mind the actual background, but I am bothered by the round shape of the pipe pointing in our direction, but it is such an attention magnet that I don't even see the dog's eyes anymore. Your description had me look at them, but I had to forcibly concentrate to see past the pipe.

I do like images that are like puzzles.
Images that combine planes of glass, mirrors, reflections, shadows, ghosts of other sideways reflections etc.
When done well (i.e. when the components work harmoniously together) they create a feeling of 1+1=3.
I can't say that this one will enter into the pantheon of my all time favourites, but it is not bad.
Maybe not 1+1=3 but 1+1=2.50.
And that should be good enough.

The odd proportions of house and sky must certainly be a conscious choice, but I am not really on board here.
And I was wondering why that was.
I can't come up with any other explanation than the fact that I subconscously know where the man's feet are, respective to his upper body.
And then it may sound odd, but I feel like his (invisible) feet are really too close to the bottom edge.
And no, that is a DIFFERENT thing than just saying that I wanted to see more of the house.
It's the shape and size of the person that throws the balance off, for me.

So glad to see the dam birds return, and not just to the dam, or to your photo-taking, but to our weekly gathering.
Your poetic compositions of light, water, spray, fragile birds and brutalistic concrete have always been a true highlight of our gatherings over on the previous site.
I am glad that the dam birds have found a new home and haven.
I look forward to seeing many many more.
The individual image?
A moment of magic frozen in time.
That sounds like a lot (and it is) but for Minniev that is just another day at the office.

Well, from the photo data it is clear that you DID consider a title : "Pool of Uncertainty".
I think that does not speak much. It feels a bit like forcing meaning onto the viewer.
Untitled is better: let the viewer make up his/her mind.
For me, the image lacks a real handle, a clear point of focus or interest.
And oddly, the reflections make the water look hugely pixellated.
And I mean that in a mega way, not on the pixel level.
The way the colours get refracted really feels like the natural equivalent of pixelation.

Hello Linda, and welcome.
Nice to have you.

I am a bit late with my welcome, but life and work got in the way the past few days.
I am catching up, but thankfully Minniev has been the most loyal keeper of the fort (as she always is).

We hope to see much more from you, because this first showing is utterly promising.
It is an IR-type conversion (interesting) of a plant macro.
Now, you must know that plants are usually not my main interest (cats are even worse).
But this one triggers so many associations.
I see strands of DNA revolving and trying to create life.
I see amoebes carving our their territory.
I see alien life forms getting ready to invade.
(This must be a reference to the "Alien" prequel "Prometheus" that is popping up in my mind, wherein the spores of alien parasites are inhaled and then wreak havoc on the host. Enough to create a lifelong phobia of pollen...)
Associations and references are good.
It means that the image gets my head spinning and my cultural juices flowing.
More of that, please.

A peaceful scene. Two boats passing (with the sailboat maybe a bit too close to the top edge?)
And the highlight and focal point of the image, is a human hand: an expression of expressiveness.

I wouldn't buy them either. :) These are "I need to see what happens when I try something" shots. Everything about the setup is wrong and not ideal, but it's what I've currently got to work with. The colors just sorta happen. It started ooc as a blinding red (so that part of the idea failed), then I tried some blue, did some b&w, weird blending techniques, and it just doesn't feel right no matter what. It became a matter of something bad is better than nothing good.

What do you think would have made it more upbeat? I had not even considered any emotional tone with the color, but your assessment feels very true, and because of personal reasons, perhaps I am subconsciously projecting something unintentionally.

Wow, Roel, what a marvelous welcome! I had just finished reading your poetic response to MinnieV's dam bird (I've known her online since before her award and exhibit, so I've enjoyed the dam birds for many years). I'm delighted by your reaction to my seed pods! Looking forward to spending quality time with all you folks.