DPRevived & The Photo
  • Web Site
  • chevron_right Threads
  • label All Forums
  • label Gear Photographic Equipment
  • label Sigma Sigma

Sigma SD-14 (2007) / Sigma Quattro H (2016-17)

Maoby
Oct. 30, 2023
chat_bubble_outline 4
  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    Oct. 30, 2023, 1:45 p.m. Oct. 30, 2023, 1:45 p.m.
    link

    Sigma 10 years apart

    I finally made a comparison between my Sigma SD-14 (2007) and Sigma sd Quattro H (2017)

    The results can be found here : www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720312225868

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/53287377120_c12063c12f_h.jpg
    Sigma SD-14 (2007) / Sigma sd Quattro H (2017)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Sigma SD14 (2007)
    4.6 MP (2652 x 1768) APS-C Foveon sensor
    Or 14 MP (2652 x 1768) x3 layers
    Price: $1,580.00 USD
    Photos taken with the Sigma 18-125 mm 1:3.5-5.6 DC
    (with a multiplication factor of 1.7)
    100-800 (1600) ISO


    Sigma sd Quattro H (2016-17)
    25.56 MP APS-H sensor (6192 x 4128)
    Price: $1,200.00 USD
    Photos taken with the Sigma 24-105mm F4 DG OS HSM Art
    (with a multiplication factor of 1.35)
    ISO 100-6400

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/53285988302_76f483ca11_h.jpg
    N°05 Sigma SD14 (2007)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/53287129443_4242de39a7_h.jpg
    N°05 Sigma Quattro H (2016-17)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Your remarks are welcome!
    www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720312225868

    OpenCube, ArvoJ, sattva and 1 other user like this.

    favorite 4

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    Dec. 13, 2023, 6:14 p.m. Dec. 13, 2023, 6:14 p.m.
    link

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/53286235553_98037b810c_h.jpg
    Sigma SD-14 (2007) / Sigma sd Quattro H (2017)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • link
    DavidMillier
    Members 514 posts
    Dec. 19, 2023, 10:54 a.m. Dec. 19, 2023, 10:54 a.m.
    link

    What's your opinion having done all these comparisons? I have a SD14 but I've never used a Quattro. I don't think a great deal of my SD14, because my unit suffers from yellow-green colour casts. You have to be so careful how you shoot and process it to avoid these, and I don't think it is worth the hassle. But it seems the performance of the SD14 is quite variable unit to unit.

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    Dec. 19, 2023, 11:53 a.m. Dec. 19, 2023, 11:53 a.m.
    link

    I think so, of the three Sigmas I've tested, the SD9 SD14, and Quattro H
    The SD-14 disappointed me the most, with its lack of consistency!
    And in the end, the Sigma SD9 is by far my favorite of the three.

    live.staticflickr.com/1867/44721412052_96701e8f7a_h.jpg
    Sigma SD9 (2002)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Last but not least, Sigma is more efficient in lens design. 😉

    Deleted likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    DavidMillier
    Members 514 posts
    Dec. 19, 2023, 6:34 p.m. Dec. 19, 2023, 6:34 p.m.
    link
    @Maoby has written:

    I think so, of the three Sigmas I've tested, the SD9 SD14, and Quattro H
    The SD-14 disappointed me the most, with its lack of consistency!
    And in the end, the Sigma SD9 is by far my favorite of the three.

    live.staticflickr.com/1867/44721412052_96701e8f7a_h.jpg
    Sigma SD9 (2002)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Last but not least, Sigma is more efficient in lens design. 😉

    I've got one of those too, and I don't like it either! Colour is too yellow in warm light for my taste and it exaggerates blues and totally desaturates greens. Good for B&W. But that's just my opinion, plenty of people still like the SD9. Mine keeps my SD14 company in the attic. My favourite Foveon was the DP2M but even that one wasn't good enough to persuade me to keep it. I've given up on Sigma.

arrow_upward Go to top
  • DPRevived.com is owned and operated by The Photographer's Foundation Limited, registered in England, company number 14795583. Email: management@DPRevived.com
powered by misago