Scene luminance has nothing to do with exposure.

😁😎

as ive said it doesnt matter as the jpeg is clipped. couldnt care less what the raw is because the info is all there.
your out of ammo give up.

And those values that you converted to a 16 bit file that read 250 250 250 are not raw data

I dont care what the raw file is doing ,the fact remains the OOC jpegs has clipped and unreadable information. the raw does not.
and the camera histogram represents the raw file NOT the jpeg.

zoom in on the camera histogram

You do realize that if you change the color profile that created that jpeg or even the color space used that jpeg image it may not even show clipping

I have read a paper about using the incamera histogram as a luminence meter and they said auto WB is the best setting. My cameras dont
have RGB live histograms.

No, he doesn't realize anything ... he's not here to learn anything, he's here to piss us all off and to bask in the Donald-bashing.

Nobody on the planet could be that stupid - so it has to be deliberate!

Bring it on, Donald, I'm ready for you - give it your best shot!

That is total nonsense and you are again squirting words out of the wrong hole.

I can guarantee you 100% that Sony engineers will also tell you your camera's histogram is not a raw histogram.

For a given scene your camera's histogram will vary according to the WB and colour space settings you set which proves your camera's histogram cannot possibly be a raw histogram.

People in this thread have shown you the flaws in your findings and logic. You choosing to not accept them does not make your logic and findings true 🙂

You're wasting your time, Danno.

[deleted]

That's almost pure black!

He's only a chihuahua, Don. Lots of snarling and repetitive barking. Thinks he is smart and tough but doesn't realize how stupid he appears.
But he has pride of place on his owner's lap.

Birds of a feather ...

You really don't understand. Interesting.

This histogram shows clipping.

On behalf of us all - screw you, idiot.

But the JPEG was radiant!

Yes, anything over 255 255 255 would be truly radiant in 8-bit terms .. whiter than white, eh?