ISO 450
I may have applied EC, though when using Auto-ISO I usually don't. Since it was in Manual Exposure mode I think the EC doesn't show up in the EXIF data (I can't find it here or in a couple of other files I looked at).
ISO 450
I may have applied EC, though when using Auto-ISO I usually don't. Since it was in Manual Exposure mode I think the EC doesn't show up in the EXIF data (I can't find it here or in a couple of other files I looked at).
@xpatUSA has written: @TonyBeach has written:
Tony, could you tell us what ISO was used for the shot and was any Exposure Compensation applied (if so, how much)?
ISO 450
I may have applied EC, though when using Auto-ISO I usually don't. Since it was in Manual Exposure mode I think the EC doesn't show up in the EXIF data (I can't find it here or in a couple of other files I looked at).
In Sony files the EC tag is Exif.Photo.ExposureBiasValue. Exiv2 shows it in form Exif.Photo.ExposureBiasValue SRational 1 -7/10 EV.
EC was -0.7
And Exif.Photo.ExposureBiasValue SRational 1 0 EV in a picture with no exposure correction.
@xpatUSA has written: @TonyBeach has written:
Tony, could you tell us what ISO was used for the shot and was any Exposure Compensation applied (if so, how much)?
ISO 450
Thanks Tony!
Mystery of "Light Value" solved to my satisfaction ...
LV = EV corrected to ISO100 = log2(N^2/t) - log2(450/100) = 9.34 - 2.17 = 7.17.
@DonaldB has written:conclusion: exposure = shutter, t stop, and scene luminance which is displayed by the histogram now we have practical picture (pun) to work off.
The histogram is computed using ISO, WB, etc settings (JPEG), none of them being part of exposure.
the very comprehensive paper i read said that using Auto Wb is used to use a histogram as a luminance meter.
@DonaldB has written:Ok the penny has dropped. and i conceive defeat . well sort of
conclusion: exposure = shutter, t stop, and scene luminance which is displayed by the histogram now we have practical picture (pun) to work off.
come on guys you have dropped the ball explaining the concept to the limited scientific minds. π
My fees are cheap if you want to quote my conclusion. π
The in camera histogram does not measure scene luminance. Itβs affected by other things, too.
www.image-engineering.de/content/library/conference_papers/before_2009/luminance_meters.pdf
Deleted
@SrMi has written: @DonaldB has written:conclusion: exposure = shutter, t stop, and scene luminance which is displayed by the histogram now we have practical picture (pun) to work off.
The histogram is computed using ISO, WB, etc settings (JPEG), none of them being part of exposure.
the very comprehensive paper i read said that using Auto Wb is used to use a histogram as a luminance meter.
You misunderstood something. At the very least, the camera needs to be characterized first, to determine the transfer function.
[deleted]
@DonaldB has written: @JimKasson has written: @DonaldB has written:Ok the penny has dropped. and i conceive defeat . well sort of
conclusion: exposure = shutter, t stop, and scene luminance which is displayed by the histogram now we have practical picture (pun) to work off.
come on guys you have dropped the ball explaining the concept to the limited scientific minds. π
My fees are cheap if you want to quote my conclusion. π
The in camera histogram does not measure scene luminance. Itβs affected by other things, too.
www.image-engineering.de/content/library/conference_papers/before_2009/luminance_meters.pdf
The word "histogram" does not even appear there.
Yup.
@JACS has written: @DonaldB has written: @JimKasson has written: @DonaldB has written:Ok the penny has dropped. and i conceive defeat . well sort of
conclusion: exposure = shutter, t stop, and scene luminance which is displayed by the histogram now we have practical picture (pun) to work off.
come on guys you have dropped the ball explaining the concept to the limited scientific minds. π
My fees are cheap if you want to quote my conclusion. π
The in camera histogram does not measure scene luminance. Itβs affected by other things, too.
www.image-engineering.de/content/library/conference_papers/before_2009/luminance_meters.pdf
The word "histogram" does not even appear there.
Yup.
it was just a good article about luminance. and does contradict many members writings here.
@xpatUSA has written: @DonaldB has written:Quote: A histogram is simply a graphic representation of the exposure levels within an image.
Just levels, Donald, not "exposure levels".
the article i read said exposure levels.
Which article?
Which histogram?
What is exposure level?
it was just a good article about luminance. and does contradict many members writings here.
Not sure what you're talking about. Be explicit about the contradictions that you see. List them.
@DonaldB has written: @xpatUSA has written: @DonaldB has written:Quote: A histogram is simply a graphic representation of the exposure levels within an image.
Just levels, Donald, not "exposure levels".
the article i read said exposure levels.
Which article?
Which histogram?
What is exposure level?
@DonaldB has written: @xpatUSA has written: @DonaldB has written:Quote: A histogram is simply a graphic representation of the exposure levels within an image.
Just levels, Donald, not "exposure levels".
the article i read said exposure levels.
This one? (not a trap)
no but it says the same as this one.
@IliahBorg has written: @DonaldB has written: @xpatUSA has written: @DonaldB has written:Quote: A histogram is simply a graphic representation of the exposure levels within an image.
Just levels, Donald, not "exposure levels".
the article i read said exposure levels.
Which article?
Which histogram?
What is exposure level?
I don't find "Exposure levels" there.