As I click on 'Users' I'm wonder if the ordering should be by (ranked/total) perhaps percent to two decimal places, further ordered by total posts.
It doesn't seem fair to see for example @DanHasLeftForum at the top with a mere 0.07% by (ranked/total) while for example @AlanSh is at #4 with 4.41%.
It's the top posters in the last 30 days or soemthing like that.
Don't worry too much about it - it's just a number.
Alan
<deleted>
I have never understood what constitutes a “ranked” post.
"Liked"
Post within last 30 days.
Thanks, I thought it was "liked" too ...
... so I withdraw the wrongly-based original suggestion ... sorry for wasting y'all's time. 😖
Hi,
Glad it isn't Rank, as in stinks! :P
Stan
"...someone with postal diarrhea gets to be the top guy..."
My posts are all high quality 😇😇😎
And I see you are close behind me in 2nd spot on the tally board.
* I assume you are aware people can still see previous versions of posts.
* I assume you are talking about previous versions of posts as found in posts by other than the originator e.g. when quoted in full or in part by others.
If not, please tell us how "people can still see previous versions of posts" ...
You assume incorrectly.
People can see previous versions of a post even when the previous versions are not quoted by other members in later posts.
By clicking on 'edited X times'?
Thanks Arvo, now it is clear, I've never tried clicking on that before.
A pity that nobody-knows-who-he-is didn't make that clear ...
Yes.
Someone pointed that out in another thread a few months ago. Maybe it was you?
Said no math or physics teacher ever. 😁
I'm just a humble insignificant bottom of the food chain member here 😇😇😊
humble ?!!
