DPRevived & The Photo
  • Web Site
  • chevron_right Threads
  • label All Forums
  • label Genres Photographic Genres
  • label Documentary Documentary and Street

No title

Daneland
March 10, 2024
chat_bubble_outline 15
  • link
    Daneland
    Members 1079 posts
    March 10, 2024, 9:45 p.m. March 10, 2024, 9:45 p.m.
    link

    L1060190.jpg

    L1060190.jpg

    JPG, 1.1 MB, uploaded by Daneland on March 10, 2024.

    Dunlin likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    davidwien
    Team 1676 posts
    March 12, 2024, 3:28 p.m. March 12, 2024, 3:28 p.m.
    link

    Why no title?

    David

  • link
    Daneland
    Members 1079 posts
    March 12, 2024, 3:53 p.m. March 12, 2024, 3:53 p.m.
    link
    @davidwien has written:

    Why no title?

    David

    I could not find one ...

  • link
    GreatBustard
    Members 695 posts
    March 12, 2024, 6:44 p.m. March 12, 2024, 6:44 p.m.
    link

    [retracted]

  • link
    ArvoJ
    Team 770 posts
    March 12, 2024, 7:16 p.m. March 12, 2024, 7:16 p.m.
    link
    @GreatBustard has written:

    I have a title! But, it's a bit controversial, so I won't say, unless people want to hear it. I'm not kidding -- it's a really good title. But, like I said, controversial.

    Like "Rush hour" or something?

  • link
    bobn2
    Team 2240 posts
    March 12, 2024, 7:21 p.m. March 12, 2024, 7:21 p.m.
    link
    @GreatBustard has written:

    I have a title! But, it's a bit controversial, so I won't say, unless people want to hear it. I'm not kidding -- it's a really good title. But, like I said, controversial.

    Come on, spit it out, and I'll permaban you if I don't like it.

    JACS and Daneland like this.

    favorite 2

  • link
    GreatBustard
    Members 695 posts
    March 12, 2024, 10:44 p.m. March 12, 2024, 10:44 p.m.
    link

    [retracted]

  • link
    AlanSh
    Forum Admin 2965 posts
    March 12, 2024, 10:59 p.m. March 12, 2024, 10:59 p.m.
    link

    Is it me, or is there a lot of noise in that picture when you look at it at 100%?

    Alan

  • link
    Daneland
    Members 1079 posts
    March 12, 2024, 11:05 p.m. March 12, 2024, 11:05 p.m.
    link
    @AlanSh has written:

    Is it me, or is there a lot of noise in that picture when you look at it at 100%?

    Alan

    What noise :)

    I think it is low quality JPEG and underexposed shadows originally

    L1060190-2.jpg

    L1060190-2.jpg

    JPG, 13.7 MB, uploaded by Daneland on March 12, 2024.

  • link
    AlanSh
    Forum Admin 2965 posts
    March 12, 2024, 11:55 p.m. March 12, 2024, 11:55 p.m.
    link

    Just looking at the face, fingers, wall. Maybe that's how it is.

    image.png

    image.png

    PNG, 2.0 MB, uploaded by AlanSh on March 12, 2024.

  • link
    Deleted Removed user
    March 13, 2024, 1:10 a.m. March 13, 2024, 1:10 a.m.
    link
    @Daneland has written:
    @AlanSh has written:

    Is it me, or is there a lot of noise in that picture when you look at it at 100%?

    Alan

    What noise :)

    LOL

    Quoted message:

    I think it is low quality JPEG and underexposed shadows originally

    L1060190-2.jpg

    Not sure about underexposed shadows - camera settings say 9.5 LV about right for that scene and it IS a Leica ...

    ... but then it was multi-segment metering, so who really knows what the lighting value was?

    Posted JPEG is fully chroma sub-sampled (4:2:0) but couldn't find the compression Quality in the EXIF.

  • link
    Daneland
    Members 1079 posts
    March 13, 2024, 9:21 p.m. March 13, 2024, 9:21 p.m.
    link

    RAW
    [L1060190-3.jpg]

    NR LRC
    [L1060190-Enhanced-NR.jpg]

    @xpatUSA has written:
    @Daneland has written:
    @AlanSh has written:

    Is it me, or is there a lot of noise in that picture when you look at it at 100%?

    Alan

    What noise :)

    LOL

    Quoted message:

    I think it is low quality JPEG and underexposed shadows originally

    Not sure about underexposed shadows - camera settings say 9.5 LV about right for that scene and it IS a Leica ...

    ... but then it was multi-segment metering, so who really knows what the lighting value was?

    Posted JPEG is fully chroma sub-sampled (4:2:0) but couldn't find the compression Quality in the EXIF.

    L1060190-Enhanced-NR.jpg

    JPG, 7.7 MB, uploaded by Daneland on March 13, 2024.

    L1060190-3.jpg

    JPG, 19.2 MB, uploaded by Daneland on March 13, 2024.

  • link
    Deleted Removed user
    March 13, 2024, 10:28 p.m. March 13, 2024, 10:28 p.m.
    link
    @Daneland has written:

    RAW
    [L1060190-3.jpg]

    NR LRC
    [L1060190-Enhanced-NR.jpg]

    @xpatUSA has written:
    @Daneland has written:
    @AlanSh has written:

    Is it me, or is there a lot of noise in that picture when you look at it at 100%?

    Alan

    What noise :)

    LOL

    Quoted message:

    I think it is low quality JPEG and underexposed shadows originally

    Not sure about underexposed shadows - camera settings say 9.5 LV about right for that scene and it IS a Leica ...

    ... but then it was multi-segment metering, so who really knows what the lighting value was?

    Posted JPEG is fully chroma sub-sampled (4:2:0) but couldn't find the compression Quality in the EXIF.

    Sorry, I don't understand what these images are supposed to tell us and I have no idea what "LRC" means.

  • link
    Daneland
    Members 1079 posts
    March 13, 2024, 10:41 p.m. March 13, 2024, 10:41 p.m.
    link
    @xpatUSA has written:
    @Daneland has written:

    RAW
    [L1060190-3.jpg]

    NR LRC
    [L1060190-Enhanced-NR.jpg]

    @xpatUSA has written:
    @Daneland has written:
    @AlanSh has written:

    Is it me, or is there a lot of noise in that picture when you look at it at 100%?

    Alan

    What noise :)

    LOL

    Quoted message:

    I think it is low quality JPEG and underexposed shadows originally

    Not sure about underexposed shadows - camera settings say 9.5 LV about right for that scene and it IS a Leica ...

    ... but then it was multi-segment metering, so who really knows what the lighting value was?

    Posted JPEG is fully chroma sub-sampled (4:2:0) but couldn't find the compression Quality in the EXIF.

    Sorry, I don't understand what these images are supposed to tell us and I have no idea what "LRC" means.

    RAW is converted from RAW w/o any adjustments, I posted it to show how much it is actually underexposed, the second one is Lightroom Classic noise reduction applied to the first post

    AlanSh likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    Deleted Removed user
    March 13, 2024, 11:24 p.m. March 13, 2024, 11:24 p.m.
    link
    @Daneland has written:
    @xpatUSA has written:
    @Daneland has written:

    RAW
    [L1060190-3.jpg]

    NR LRC
    [L1060190-Enhanced-NR.jpg]

    @xpatUSA has written:
    @Daneland has written:
    @AlanSh has written:

    Is it me, or is there a lot of noise in that picture when you look at it at 100%?

    Alan

    What noise :)

    LOL

    Quoted message:

    I think it is low quality JPEG and underexposed shadows originally

    Not sure about underexposed shadows - camera settings say 9.5 LV about right for that scene and it IS a Leica ...

    ... but then it was multi-segment metering, so who really knows what the lighting value was?

    Posted JPEG is fully chroma sub-sampled (4:2:0) but couldn't find the compression Quality in the EXIF.

    Sorry, I don't understand what these images are supposed to tell us and I have no idea what "LRC" means.

    RAW is converted from RAW w/o any adjustments, I posted it to show how much it is actually underexposed, the second one is Lightroom Classic noise reduction applied to the first post

    Understood, thanks. A difficult shot if the girl was the subject, with the bright overhead lights fooling the matrix exposure metering.

  • link
    davidwien
    Team 1676 posts
    March 14, 2024, 9:30 a.m. March 14, 2024, 9:30 a.m.
    link

    I like the full shot, but would trim the sides so that the bars are not visible. Then it looks like the end of the carriage, where the camera is, has been sawn off!

    David

    Daneland likes this.

    favorite 1

arrow_upward Go to top
  • DPRevived.com is owned and operated by The Photographer's Foundation Limited, registered in England, company number 14795583. Email: management@DPRevived.com
powered by misago