DPRevived & The Photo
  • Web Site
  • chevron_right Threads
  • label All Forums
  • label Discussion News and Discussions
  • label History The History of Photography

My Little History of DSLR/ML

Maoby
April 24, 2023
chat_bubble_outline 217
first_page chevron_left
chevron_right last_page
first_page chevron_left
chevron_right last_page
  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    April 30, 2023, 7:21 p.m. April 30, 2023, 7:21 p.m.
    link

    The Four Tenors of 1999-2000 😁

    Canon D30/ Minolta RD-3000/ FinePix S1/ Nikon D1

    live.staticflickr.com/7609/17266086881_0eb1ad151b_k.jpg
    Canon D30/ Minolta RD-3000/ FinePix S1/ Nikon D1
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Canon EOS D30 (2000) 3 MP $3,500.00 USD
    Minolta RD-3000 (1999) 2.7 MP $3,400.00 USD
    Fujifilm FinePix S1 (2000) 3.4 MP $3,500.00 USD
    Digital SLR D1 (99-2000) 2.7 MP $5,600.00 USD

    The turn of the century was a great time for photographers who preferred DSLRs to compacts
    Affordable prices hover around $3,500 except for the Nikon. Contrary to the prices we were accustomed to seeing with DSLRs from 1991-1998 of $10,000 to $30,000 USD

    The big question in the year 2000 is, buy or wait!

  • link
    StanDisbrow
    Members 449 posts
    April 30, 2023, 7:58 p.m. April 30, 2023, 7:58 p.m.
    link

    Hi,

    I bought. A D1. After trying to not to. Mainly because that price tag was equal to what I'd already spent on an E2, a Kodak 460, and an E3s (which I had hoped was enough of an improvement over the E2 - and it wasn't).

    And then I discovered I needed Nikon's raw processing program and a new PC to run it to boot.

    Stan

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    April 30, 2023, 10:38 p.m. April 30, 2023, 10:38 p.m.
    link

    Olympus E-10 (2000)

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/49636332917_f026f99520_k.jpg
    Olympus E-10 (2000)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Olympus' first DSLR
    2/3” CCD sensor with 3,900,000 pixels (2240x1680)
    Storage: SmartMedia & Compactflash
    Objectif 9-36mm (35-140mm)
    (facteur de multiplication de 3.89)
    $1,950.00 USD

    live.staticflickr.com/5491/14114026601_052669a808_k.jpg
    Olympus E-10
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    It was when the famous Canon EOS-300D was released in 2003 and the price drop that followed
    That I was able to buy the Olympus E-10 for almost peanuts 😎

    Personally, I really like her look! 👍🏻

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/49636055416_8baf2539b5_k.jpg
    Olympus E-10 (2000)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/6099/6215394915_9df13efcd7_b.jpg
    I'm watching you.
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/6051/6326986309_628dc65412_b.jpg
    Nice legs
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/6174/6235776635_a10457cc5c_h.jpg
    B&W
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    May 1, 2023, 3:01 a.m. May 1, 2023, 3:01 a.m.
    link

    Kodak DCS 760 (2001)

    Between 1999 and 2001
    Kodak used the magnificent Nikon F5 as the basis for the DCS 600 and 700 series

    live.staticflickr.com/1872/43829345135_f10120e6aa_k.jpg
    Kodak DCS 760 (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    The DCS 760 enters the market as a direct competitor to Nikon's new 5.47 megapixel D1x
    Kodak slashed prices dramatically. Under pressure from Nikon D1 sales.

    The Kodak DCS 760 is sold for 1/3 of the asking price for the DCS 660 in 1999!!

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/49510655618_0443eddb8d_k.jpg
    Kodak DCS 760 (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Kodak DCS760 (2001)
    6 MP sensor (3040x2008)
    with a multiplication factor of 1.3x
    Price: $9,000.00 USD
    ISO 80-400

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51557261511_6c75c228fe_k.jpg
    N°03 Kodak DCS 760 (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/6180/6244738331_785b354bb6_b.jpg
    A little fat( Kodak DCS 760 )
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/7010/6532057075_f99977caf0_h.jpg
    HAPPY HOLIDAYS ( Kodak DCS 760 )
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/48584163011_6b2bc2445a_k.jpg
    N°02 Kodak DCS 760 (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    JimKasson likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    May 1, 2023, 10:54 a.m. May 1, 2023, 10:54 a.m.
    link

    Nikon Digital SLR D1X (2001)

    An update of the D1

    Nikon D1X
    With a 5.47 MP sensor (3006 x 1962)
    And an extrapolation with LR which ultimately gives an image of 10.5 MP (4011x2614)
    See here for more explanation: www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm
    $5,500.00 USD

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/49511479722_ed67d309eb_k.jpg
    Nikon Professional Digital SLR D1X (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickrckr

    live.staticflickr.com/860/30047039388_4adc62a27c_k.jpg
    Break Up
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/857/43212426674_44984043fc_k.jpg
    In the clouds
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/1776/29000252237_d283aae927_k.jpg
    Don't move
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    May 1, 2023, 1:39 p.m. May 1, 2023, 1:39 p.m.
    link

    Kodak DCS 720x (2001)

    The last of the Kodak DCS based on the magnificent Nikon F5

    live.staticflickr.com/1883/43829344585_0ef92fed44_k.jpg
    Kodak DCS 720x (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    I never understood Kodak's strategy toward digital photography!
    It is the first to promote digital and has dominated the professional industry for more than 10 years.
    While developing unique expertise with these magnificent sensors.
    Finally, all dropped, at the first opportunity. I would like to know what really happened in the heads of the leaders!!

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/49548729438_20d91a85c1_k.jpg
    Kodak DCS 720X (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/7812/46789496462_6f365d98f2_h.jpg
    Kodak DCS 720x (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/7780/27027694780_dfb95ef788_h.jpg
    military march( Kodak DCS 720x )
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/7349/27292595836_5315e8d408_h.jpg
    Kodak DCS 720x
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51782349366_44903b2b68_h.jpg
    N°01 Kodak DCS 720x (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    May 1, 2023, 6:12 p.m. May 1, 2023, 6:12 p.m.
    link

    Nikon D1H (2001)

    2.74 MP sensor (2012x1324 )
    $4,500.00

    live.staticflickr.com/1878/29833523657_0f51ed7f03_k.jpg
    Nikon D1H (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/47929330538_bdabd98bc1_k.jpg
    I always had doubts
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/5603/31277427833_9cf258a921_k.jpg
    N°05 Nikon D1H
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/5697/30562220114_2eeb1a3ccb_k.jpg
    Intrusion
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/5734/30363915024_f9cea38da0_k.jpg
    Winter reading
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • link
    StanDisbrow
    Members 449 posts
    May 1, 2023, 6:56 p.m. May 1, 2023, 6:56 p.m.
    link

    Hi,

    The entire digital operation was for the Federal Sector, then later for the industrial sector. By the time they had the models you have, they were targeting the News area for Professional photography. That slowly spilled out to event shooters and a few others. They never meant it to be for the masses.

    The masses were served by the rest of Kodak. Meaning film.

    An odd thing occurred though. As they were buying stripped down film bodies from Nikon and Canon, and selling some back to boot, more film shooters wanted digital. Kodak wound up with increased sales and so some economy of scale and the price tags dropped.

    Then, both Nikon and Canon brought out more bang for the buck. Kodak wasn't going to compete. They had another generation in process, but that wasn't going to continue for long. They needed something more and so they turned to another sensor maker and some other film bodies to make that change. And they had....problems....

    At this point, Kodak Main figured out that this digital stuff was eroding their film sales. So it was time to lock up their own digital competition. Way too late for that, but this desire combined with the 14 MP problems put paid to their making entire cameras. Now they were pulled back into leveraging their CCD sensor designs. First into the Pro Backs then into the Leica DMR and so on.

    I bought my 760c and 720x during the end-times fire sale directly from Kodak. A little later I picked up a Pro Back and a Contax 645. I also scored a 660m from someone lucky enough to score 760m right there at the end. I tried to get one directly as I did the other stuff, but they were already sold out.

    So there I was, all Kodak equipped in 2003, and I sold off just about everything else I had save for an old E2 and my 520c and my D1H. Now the Pro Back is gone, the 720x is gone when I bought a Df in 2018. And the 660m went in 2020 to pay for most of my Pentax 645D based kit.

    Oh, I did try and pry a 10 MP 760c out of them, but all they had was a couple test beds for that sensor and they weren't going to let me have one. To get that, I'd need to buy a DMR and an R9 and a bunch of lenses. Too costly for me!

    Stan

    JimKasson likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    May 1, 2023, 7:36 p.m. May 1, 2023, 7:36 p.m.
    link

    Thank you very much for your explanations, you witnessed the collapse of Kodak very closely
    A total lack of long-term vision on the part of the leaders, it's really a pity, I would like to see a Kodak DCS version 2023 😁
    Finally, Fujifilm made the transition from film to digital much better.

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    May 1, 2023, 9:50 p.m. May 1, 2023, 9:50 p.m.
    link

    Olympus E-20 (2001)

    An update of the E-10

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51943816869_613dfdd36d_k.jpg
    Olympus E-20 (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Sony sensor of 2/3 '' (8.8 x 6.6 mm) of 4.92 MP (2560x1920)
    Price: $2,000 USD
    Lens 9-36mm (35-140mm)
    (multiplication factor of 3.89)
    80-320 ISO

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51958472444_521a000692_k.jpg
    N°03 Olympus E-20 (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Olympus E-10 (2000) CCD sensor 2/3 '' (8.8 x 6.6 mm) of 3.9 MP (2240x1680)
    Olympus E-20 (2001) Sony sensor of 2/3 '' (8.8 x 6.6 mm) of 4.92 MP (2560x1920)

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51957204172_5fe640ed42_k.jpgOlympus E-10 (2000) / Olympus E-20 (2001) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    I paid my E-10 $1,100.00 CAD in 2003
    and paid the E-20 $12.00 USD in 2022 😎

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    May 2, 2023, 2:20 a.m. May 2, 2023, 2:20 a.m.
    link

    Canon EOS 1D (2001)

    live.staticflickr.com/1894/29833775427_57da13c14f_k.jpg
    Canon EOS-1D (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    First Canon Digital Pro
    4,060,000 pixel sensor (2464x1648)
    Storage: CompactFlash
    Price: $7,300 USD
    Canon's real answer to the Nikon D1/D1H/D1X

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/46963369614_0f3cc9a1da_k.jpg
    Canon EOS-1D (2001) / Nikon D1x (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    A superb machine for the pros.
    With a CCD sensor (28.7 x 19.1 mm) APS-H for a factor of x 1.3
    A 50mm behaves like a 65mm in 24x36
    The EOS-1D is the only Canon SLR with a CCD sensor

    live.staticflickr.com/5564/14558459408_d8fb4d1652_b.jpg
    My Canon EOS-1D (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/3895/14757216725_367cc2ef4c_k.jpg
    O
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/5453/16586641973_f79e689473_k.jpg
    Help me
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/8772/17117293508_5e60ca40d2_k.jpg
    Invitation
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    I've always had a weakness for the APS-H format ❤️

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/33875522998_7e2707c7c5_k.jpg
    Canon EOS-1D (2001) / Nikon D1x (2001)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    May 2, 2023, 12:41 p.m. May 2, 2023, 12:41 p.m.
    link

    Canon EOS D60 (2002)

    Canon EOS D60 with a 6.3 MP sensor (3072x2048)
    Price: $2,200 USD
    (multiplication factor of 1.6) APS-C
    ISO100-1000

    live.staticflickr.com/1863/42959972840_0b366573b8_k.jpg
    Canon EOS D60 (2002)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Surely a little frustration, for those who bought the D30 at $3,500.00 with only 3 MP
    It was the harsh reality of the time!

    live.staticflickr.com/7401/13930682660_b8004fc28f_k.jpg
    Canon EOS D60
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/2920/14128872098_bf4ca26882_h.jpg
    Magnetic Door... Canon EOS D60 (2002)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/5479/14313370636_bd91f9bf84_k.jpg
    Yellow Time
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/1795/30161959788_587640bdc7_k.jpg
    N°07 Canon EOS D60
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • link
    StanDisbrow
    Members 449 posts
    May 2, 2023, 12:44 p.m. May 2, 2023, 12:44 p.m.
    link

    Hi,

    It was one heck of a shame. And I was pretty much floored by it all. To the point of emailing a Kodak board member at the time saying so. Not that this had any effect. It was so sad to watch happen.

    But I shot with their stuff for a long time. 03-18. And I have that Kodak CCD in the P645D which isn't going anywhere even once I get a newer medium format camera. It just isn't worth selling these days. Might as well use it some. It's done well capturing the lighthouse series.

    Yes, Fuji has done what Kodak ought to have. Done very well, indeed.

    Stan

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    May 2, 2023, 1:17 p.m. May 2, 2023, 1:17 p.m.
    link
    @StanDisbrow has written:

    Hi,

    It was one heck of a shame. And I was pretty much floored by it all. To the point of emailing a Kodak board member at the time saying so. Not that this had any effect. It was so sad to watch happen.

    But I shot with their stuff for a long time. 03-18. And I have that Kodak CCD in the P645D which isn't going anywhere even once I get a newer medium format camera. It just isn't worth selling these days. Might as well use it some. It's done well capturing the lighthouse series.

    Yes, Fuji has done what Kodak ought to have. Done very well, indeed.

    Stan

    I wish Kodak had bought Pentax or Minolta when both were having trouble.
    The sequel would surely have been very interesting! 😎

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    May 2, 2023, 2:57 p.m. May 2, 2023, 2:57 p.m.
    link

    Nikon D100 (2002)

    live.staticflickr.com/1899/44052161824_122b70519b_k.jpg
    Nikon D100 (2002)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Nikon D100 (2002)
    6.3 MP CCD sensor (3008 x 2000)
    Price: $2,400 USD
    APS-C (with a multiplication factor of 1.5) DX
    200-1600 (6400) ISO

    live.staticflickr.com/2915/13926003670_f3ae3e4e3b_k.jpg
    Nikon D100
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/6172/6196161801_c33ea89fc4_c.jpg
    Nikon D100 (2002)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/8526/8628119475_ec136c37af_k.jpg
    The little Princess
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/8116/8624835917_042001f7f5_h.jpg
    This Way?
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    May 2, 2023, 2:57 p.m. May 2, 2023, 2:57 p.m.
    link

    In July 2002, a real face-to-face between Canon and Nikon
    The Canon EOS D60 versus the Nikon D100
    Both 6 MP for just over $2,000.00 USD

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/40765747133_d1f99a1170_k.jpg
    Canon EOS D60 (2002) / Nikon D100 (2002)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/40765675003_9b4acf201b_k.jpg
    Canon EOS D60 (2002) / Nikon D100 (2002) 100%
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/32788824757_92b5534891_k.jpg
    Canon EOS D60 (2002) / Nikon D100 (2002) 100%
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    To see the full comparison: www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157669477292166

  • link
    JimKasson
    Members 1738 posts
    May 2, 2023, 3:09 p.m. May 2, 2023, 3:09 p.m.
    link
    @Maoby has written:

    Nikon D100 (2002)
    6.3 MP CCD sensor (3008 x 2000)
    Price: $2,400 USD
    APS-C (with a multiplication factor of 1.5) DX
    200-1600 (6400) ISO

    My first, and last, underwater DSLR. Much lighter housed than my F4. I don't think I made a single topside shot with the camera.

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1587 posts
    May 2, 2023, 3:33 p.m. May 2, 2023, 3:33 p.m.
    link
    @JimKasson has written:
    @Maoby has written:

    Nikon D100 (2002)
    6.3 MP CCD sensor (3008 x 2000)
    Price: $2,400 USD
    APS-C (with a multiplication factor of 1.5) DX
    200-1600 (6400) ISO

    My first, and last, underwater DSLR. Much lighter housed than my F4. I don't think I made a single topside shot with the camera.

    Do you have any interesting pictures taken underwater with this little Nikon D100?

first_page chevron_left
chevron_right last_page
arrow_upward Go to top
  • DPRevived.com is owned and operated by The Photographer's Foundation Limited, registered in England, company number 14795583. Email: management@DPRevived.com
powered by misago