DPRevived & The Photo
  • Web Site
  • chevron_right Threads
  • label All Forums
  • label Gear Photographic Equipment
  • label Fuji Fujifilm

My LE is going back.

AlanSh
April 14, 2024
chat_bubble_outline 28
first_page chevron_left
first_page chevron_left
  • link
    ArvoJ
    Team 770 posts
    April 16, 2024, 8:49 p.m. April 16, 2024, 8:49 p.m.
    link
    @JohnSheehyRev has written:
    @ArvoJ has written:

    My Silkypix can't open those RAF files - no support for X100VI yet :(
    JPG files show clear preference for non-LE version, maybe even in centre of image, certainly in corners.

    I forgot about the slowness of raw decoding software with new cameras. and X-Trans is not going to make it any faster!

    Silkypix just crashes while opening X100VI raw file, slow or not :)

    JohnSheehyRev likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    AlanSh
    Forum Admin 2965 posts
    April 16, 2024, 8:49 p.m. April 16, 2024, 8:49 p.m.
    link
    @DonaldB has written:

    if your worried about the sharpness you should have kept the 26meg camera

    Donald, I don't EVER pixel peep that far. I have no idea what you are trying to prove. Both cameras are supposed to be identical. And I've never had a 26mp camera.

    Alan

  • link
    DonaldB
    Members 2365 posts
    April 16, 2024, 8:56 p.m. April 16, 2024, 8:56 p.m.
    link
    @AlanSh has written:
    @DonaldB has written:

    if your worried about the sharpness you should have kept the 26meg camera

    Donald, I don't EVER pixel peep that far. I have no idea what you are trying to prove. Both cameras are supposed to be identical. And I've never had a 26mp camera.

    Alan

    but the histograms are not identical so how can you have the same incamera processing defaults.

  • link
    AlanSh
    Forum Admin 2965 posts
    April 16, 2024, 9:30 p.m. April 16, 2024, 9:30 p.m.
    link

    One of the cameras is faulty? A cloud came over between picture one and two? I don't know and to be honest, I don't care now. The LE one is going back (Fuji have accepted that) and I will be left with one that works great for me.

    Alan

  • link
    DonaldB
    Members 2365 posts
    April 16, 2024, 10:01 p.m. April 16, 2024, 10:01 p.m.
    link
    @AlanSh has written:

    One of the cameras is faulty? A cloud came over between picture one and two? I don't know and to be honest, I don't care now. The LE one is going back (Fuji have accepted that) and I will be left with one that works great for me.

    Alan

    thats good, thats all that matters, i bought the most expencive microscope objective ive owned a few weeks ago thinking it would out perform my 40yo objectives. wel lthat was a big mistake and i accepted the cost as a learning curve, the well regarded nikon 10x was like new condition and it was that bad i put it in the bin, i couldnt sell it to another person knowing it was that bad.

  • link
    JohnSheehyRev
    Members 549 posts
    April 22, 2024, 2:16 a.m. April 22, 2024, 2:16 a.m.
    link
    @AlanSh has written:

    They both had exactly the same settings. The thing is, I'm not after abosulte quality here, I'm doing comparison tests to show that my original one produces better images. Which I believe I have done.

    If you want to see the originals and the RAF files, knock yourself out onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AIm881Ug_dBsz7I&id=91D191DFBA768B20%215973&cid=91D191DFBA768B20

    Alan

    I just updated FastRawViewer to 2.0.8 on my other computer and it opened both files, and it does look like the LE has ("had", as you've already made your decision) a bit more aberration in the outer regions of the frame.

  • link
    NCV
    Members 1963 posts
    April 22, 2024, 5:13 a.m. April 22, 2024, 5:13 a.m.
    link
    @AlanSh has written:

    One of the cameras is faulty? A cloud came over between picture one and two? I don't know and to be honest, I don't care now. The LE one is going back (Fuji have accepted that) and I will be left with one that works great for me.

    Alan

    It was clear that something was up with the LE . Maybe it was sample variation, or damage in transit, or again maybe a newer lens formulation to save on manufacturing costs, yes it happens, updates are not always advantageous to the buyer.

    From experience, it is no good keeping a piece of kit that you have no confidence in.

  • link
    AlanSh
    Forum Admin 2965 posts
    April 22, 2024, 8:42 a.m. April 22, 2024, 8:42 a.m.
    link

    Thank you both. Yes, it has gone back and my money returned.

    I am happy with my existing VI and have turned off the GAS (for now).

    Alan

    pointnshootpro likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    pointnshootpro
    Team 165 posts
    April 25, 2024, 1:51 p.m. April 25, 2024, 1:51 p.m.
    link
    @AlanSh has written:

    Thank you both. Yes, it has gone back and my money returned.

    I am happy with my existing VI and have turned off the GAS (for now).

    Alan

    I was going to say...It never goes away, just quelled for awhile. I am wondering if the new firmware would have fixed the issues. What was the difference between the regular vi and the LE?

  • link
    JohnSheehyRev
    Members 549 posts
    April 25, 2024, 1:58 p.m. April 25, 2024, 1:58 p.m.
    link
    @pointnshootpro has written:
    @AlanSh has written:

    Thank you both. Yes, it has gone back and my money returned.

    I am happy with my existing VI and have turned off the GAS (for now).

    Alan

    I was going to say...It never goes away, just quelled for awhile. I am wondering if the new firmware would have fixed the issues. What was the difference between the regular vi and the LE?

    If it's supposed to be the same exact lens, then I suspect that the lens in the LE was a lemon, and was not assembled correctly.
    Firmware shouldn't affect the resolution of the raw capture at all. I don't see Iliah here recently, but his FastRawViewer, I assume, would demosaic the two cameras with exactly the same interpolation, and FRV does show more aberration, especially towards the edges and corners.

    Diederik and AlanSh like this.

    favorite 2

  • link
    AlanSh
    Forum Admin 2965 posts
    April 25, 2024, 2:05 p.m. April 25, 2024, 2:05 p.m.
    link
    @pointnshootpro has written:

    What was the difference between the regular vi and the LE?

    Nothing apart from some writing on the case and a few extras like a different strap.

    Alan

    pointnshootpro likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    pointnshootpro
    Team 165 posts
    April 26, 2024, 7:42 a.m. April 26, 2024, 7:42 a.m.
    link

    Ok, so by sending it back you don't miss out on photographic features, just badly needed bling. Ha ha. I totally get it. I would want the limited edition version too.

first_page chevron_left
arrow_upward Go to top
  • DPRevived.com is owned and operated by The Photographer's Foundation Limited, registered in England, company number 14795583. Email: management@DPRevived.com
powered by misago