Owning both H2 and H2s I must say that the H2 has mainly the advantage of cropping ability. Comparing same frame same time same lens showed me no more fine details. 2 difficulties with H2 : need for a perfect focus that is not always easy to achieve especially with old lenses whether or not they areon the Fuji list. And rapidly noisy results in dim light, loss of fine details due to NR after 1600 ISO. Somehow a bit disapointed, not surprised so much due to the small size of pixels...
May 1, 2023
30
-
-
Now next question, it would be nice that the answer appears at ... the right place...
-
Here a typical exampleof a "lost answer" in the middle of .... somewhere else.. not so convenient
-
Now might be a good time to point out that there is indeed a testing subforum for all your testing needs.
-
Thx! Did not noticed it !
That said needs occur when practicing in the field, not an excuse but the primary reflex occurs at nthe point you reveal the need -
It was a reply to the post above it with all the pictures. I was trying not to quote as that produces looooonnnngggg posts (unless they get cut down).
Alan
-
Someone needs to see the thread comparing the X-Pro1 to the X-T5 and tell me again why they think the new sensor is better...
-
With a prime lens in front of the xt5, the resolution is very impressive. Can't say how it compares to other fuji cameras.
-
Ah, but then someone will ask "define 'better'" and then the topic will go way off the rails.
As one who has never had an X-Pro1, I like the 40mp sensor, most of the time. But I also think that it's lenses that make the major difference and, if Fuji came out with a smaller sized sensor in a body that did what the X-T5 does (not PASM, lots of options, screen that does what the X-T5 does, decent viewfinder), I'd still be happy with it.
-
Exactly the same thought regarding my XH2
-
I'm happy with my X-E4, or X-E3, I even shoot my original Canon 5D from time to time with a smile. But it doesn't take how happy I am with the X-T5. It's very fast to operate, IQ is great, configuration options are great, OIS, etc... Those who feel happy with the X-Pro1 alone, great!
-
That's my issue - "better" has come to mean "resolution". As if that is the only standard to judge an image by.
And worse that mentality begs the question that a camera is immediately deemed inferior as soon as a new model is released.
-
So the new sensor is either much better or much worse...glad we got this sorted.
-
The big interest of the H2 is its cropping ability. With the frame cropped frame with the 2 cameras, you will get many more pixels with the H2.
The S has a much better AFC and tracking, nearly no RS effect with ESThere is not abetter one, but an intersting choice linked to need, prefernces, and practice
Again the 40 mpx need more care for focus and exposure to achieve the best results. The 26 mpx forgive probably less attention.
I take my H2 for landscape, architecture,...
I take the S for wildlife and fast action (sports, airshows, ...)
