• Members 514 posts
    May 9, 2023, 8:57 p.m.

    Isn't that about what an iphone costs?

    I've used my wife's iphone plenty of times, she swears by it and laughs at my Moto G30, but I can't see any practical difference between them that explains the enormous price differential. Her phone cost a £1000, my camera cost £130, roughly the same as my phone...

  • Members 83 posts
    May 9, 2023, 9:15 p.m.

    Yep...

  • Members 758 posts
    May 9, 2023, 9:30 p.m.

    I bought two brand new G100's. The first cost me $475 delivered right to my door, the second $500. Brand new, local stock, with warranty. How can you go wrong? The lenses are shared with with my G9 should I require its capabilities, and they really are tiny. Raw converter software and therefore processing is the same between them all, why would you bother with a phone?

  • Members 78 posts
    May 10, 2023, 10:29 a.m.

    Same here. I used to buy high-end phones, then had to get a £180 option when I was brassic last year, and 95% of the time don't notice the difference. The camera's not as good, but at the time I had an RX100 IV which more than made up for it.

  • May 10, 2023, 11:15 a.m.

    You want a camera smaller than the Sony RX-100? A Minox?

    David

  • Members 243 posts
    May 10, 2023, 1:52 p.m.

    Well, most buy a $1000 phone for more than the camera, so not sure what dollar amount applies to just the camera within the phone. I used to bring my Nikon Coolpix A to events where compact was the best option. I am intrigued by the new version of the Ricoh. But for how I view those photos, there is no way I can justify spending another $1000 over the $1000 I already spent on my iPhone 14 pro. I would rather spend it on a 14-30, TBH.

  • Members 83 posts
    May 10, 2023, 2:17 p.m.

    For me, it really isn't about cost. Yes, they are expensive, but I can afford both a phone and a camera. But if I had the opportunity to throw my phone in the ocean I'd honestly consider it.

    And that's because a big part what I enjoy about a camera vs. a phone is the user-experience.

    I get a real sense of pleasure using my GR because it has one specific mission - make a great image.

    And given that it's been in production and been refined over 25-years, it absolutely excells at doing that - in a way that no phone, with 20+ competing "purposes", will ever match.

  • Members 244 posts
    May 10, 2023, 2:29 p.m.

    You have that “opportunity” every day of your life. Why don’t you just throw it away and be done with it?

    Or, is this just some kind of hyperbole that, unfortunately, makes your overall statement less meaningful?

  • Members 83 posts
    May 10, 2023, 9:36 p.m.

    Well I thought I was pretty clear, but I guess I can dumb it down for you - I enjoy my camera, I don't enjoy my phone, but I still need it.

  • Members 758 posts
    May 10, 2023, 11:25 p.m.

    You've only been conditioned by your employer, the government, society and so forth that you "need" a phone. You don't.

  • Members 516 posts
    May 10, 2023, 11:34 p.m.

    Of course I need a smartphone.
    Where else am I going to watch Britney Spears videos at 3AM. lol

    img.youtube.com/vi/LOZuxwVk7TU/sddefault.jpg
    "Toxic" (2003) 3:32 youtu.be/LOZuxwVk7TU

  • Members 29 posts
    May 11, 2023, 12:01 a.m.

    Depends, most places you really do need a phone.

  • Members 758 posts
    May 11, 2023, 12:20 a.m.

    Ha ha ha. Over the years, there's been outrage on many occasions regarding government tracking the movements of the general population. Yet the vast majority are happy, or think nothing of it, carrying their own little electronic tracking device that records location, time, speed, your spending habits, conversations, nearly anything you can think of. I'm not anti phones. I'm typing this right now on one. They're exceedingly handy at times. But there's very good reasons not to carry one all the time. Taking pictures is one of them -for me 😁

  • Members 514 posts
    May 11, 2023, 7:57 a.m.

    I have had a £10 per month Giffgaff rolling pay as you go deal for years. They wrote to me and suggested, based on usage stats, I consider dropping down to the £5 per month option. That's how much I need my phone.

    I use it for, er, sending whatsapp texts to my family, google maps and the ND filter exposure calculator. I made 3 calls in the last month, each of which could have been made on the landline, but that would have required walking downstairs.

  • Members 78 posts
    May 11, 2023, 8:11 a.m.

    In the UK at least, you've almost 'got' to have a smart phone now, for some website security log-ins, etc. Then there's credit card companies like Virgin, whose sole account management option is a smartphone app. In another 5-10 years it'll be nigh on impossible to exist here without one.

  • Members 83 posts
    May 11, 2023, 8:45 a.m.

    Save the philosophical Orwellian bullshit for someone else, there are real people in my life that I care for that need me, and that means a phone.

  • Members 758 posts
    May 11, 2023, 9:44 a.m.

    As have I. And that does not require a mobile phone.

    Edit -if you think that your phone cannot and does not do the things I mentioned, then you are simply naive in the extreme

  • Members 78 posts
    May 11, 2023, 10:26 a.m.

    'Can' and 'does' are different things. I'm most certainly not naive, I spend half my life slagging off our government and discussing their shady behaviour, but even I don't believe they are currently tracking and recording all of our lives.