So... I have a question for all of you here, given that a couple of people seem to enjoy shooting some flowers as well:
Do you really try to get the full flower in focus usually?
Being a macro shooter for the most part and also using old manual lenses exclusively (many of which, like projection lenses don't have a variable aperture) that thought seems very foreign to me, even though I get the notion and value of showing a full bloom in its own right of course - particularly if the intention is an accurate documentation. I still usually can't bring myself to do that.
I just find the background way too distracting most of the time, unless everything else is really far away or I got some of those (rare) lenses in hand, which seem to be able to render anything smoothly, no matter how far you stop it down.
Here's a shot with an Agfa Super-Intergon 105 mm f/5.6 (wide open), which shows the maximum DOF where I usually still feel comfortable:

Dig in, little one! by simple.joy, on Flickr
Perhaps I can sometimes deal with going to f/8, if I feel like there's enough interest in showing more and I'm already relatively close... but usually I like somewhere around this best:

No one else wanted it... now it's Robert‘s! by simple.joy, on Flickr
(shot at around f/2.8)
or even softer, like this:

Hard to be soft in a good way... by simple.joy, on Flickr
I'm curious to know your thoughts and preferences!












