Even better. confirmation of PM link received. would you like me to send a screen grab of the conversation ? its just like sending a priority paid item via post ,and taking an image of the receipt and texting the buyer the item has been posted.
Even better. confirmation of PM link received. would you like me to send a screen grab of the conversation ? its just like sending a priority paid item via post ,and taking an image of the receipt and texting the buyer the item has been posted.
@IliahBorg has written: @DonaldB has written: @JimKasson has written: @DonaldB has written:Mr Borg has them,
He says he doesn't. He says he didn't download them.
His quote "I haven't even looked at them."
My quote is:
@IliahBorg has written:I'm refusing to download the images
Even better. confirmation of PM link received. would you like me to send a screen grab of the conversation ? its just like sending a priority paid item via post ,and taking an image of the receipt and texting the buyer the item has been posted.
All that has been established is that you sent him something and he is refusing to download it for the valid reasons he posted earlier.
@DonaldB has written: @IliahBorg has written: @DonaldB has written: @JimKasson has written: @DonaldB has written:Mr Borg has them,
He says he doesn't. He says he didn't download them.
His quote "I haven't even looked at them."
My quote is:
@IliahBorg has written:I'm refusing to download the images
Even better. confirmation of PM link received. would you like me to send a screen grab of the conversation ? its just like sending a priority paid item via post ,and taking an image of the receipt and texting the buyer the item has been posted.
All that has been established is that you sent him something and he is refusing to download it for the valid reasons he posted earlier.
Post the raw files. Simple.
simple heh ๐คจ๐
WOW! 461 comments, man there's a lot more beginners here than what was at DPR!
@IliahBorg has written:Post the raw files. Simple.
simple heh
But you didn't.
would you like me to send a screen grab of the conversation ?
There was no conversation.
So what type of game is he playing?
@IliahBorg has written:There was no conversation.
So what type of game is he playing?
The one I don't want to be any part of.
@IliahBorg has written:There was no conversation.
So what type of game is he playing?
His normal trolling game ๐
@DonaldB has written: @IliahBorg has written:Post the raw files. Simple.
simple heh
But you didn't.
but you did receive the invite ๐your choice not to open .i did what you asked for. you want to back out now , thats fine.
@IliahBorg has written:There was no conversation.
So what type of game is he playing?
do think taking an image at iso 100 and iso 4000 of your kitchen is rocket science ? im glad im me. do you guys actually take test images ?
back peddling are you both after your exposure triangle theory hit a brick wall ๐ i have so much more info would make you and Bobs head spin on the whole history of photography. You guys just preach everyone else's info without doing your own research.
pisses me off more, i post a simple image and expect questions and answers related to my image . not some primary school crap all the time. is it so god dam hard to have a sensible conversation on this site without all the garbage thrown in ?
I can see how and where this is going, the very same games were played else where without much success.
Their is a great number of people that know much more than you with the topics being discussed here and it would be wise for you to take heed in their answers and that you should really stop this act that you seem so keen on playing.
The majority of your post come across as derogatory and the attituded that you could never be wrong.
Even when someone mentions shot noise you could not even be bothered to do some research on the subject and play this game that everyone else is wrong.
This is really a never-ending story with you.
Even in your "Raw histogram and why does it matter" you play this game, in your discussion there you post a link to DPR on the use of RD and that everyone should look at the article, that article in a nutshells did not disagree with anything people was tell you here.
The one person here who would be the one to setup test shots and understands what it takes to evaluate them has already let you know what he thinks of your testing methods
All that has been established is that you sent him something and he is refusing to download it for the valid reasons he posted earlier.
@IanSForsyth has written: @IliahBorg has written:There was no conversation.
So what type of game is he playing?
His normal trolling game ๐
Even better ,lets see you 2 get out of this one now ๐คฃ what are the odds 1 person is going to ask for the raw files link ๐and post the conversions showing the shadow noise comparisons. that will be even more fun.๐
@DannoLeftForums has written: @IanSForsyth has written: @IliahBorg has written:There was no conversation.
So what type of game is he playing?
His normal trolling game ๐
Even better ,lets see you 2 get out of this one now ๐คฃ what are the odds 1 person is going to ask for the raw files link ๐and post the conversions showing the shadow noise comparisons. that will be even more fun.๐
You're proving my point ๐
no games just facts.
A conversation implies that two people have exchanged ideas.
A PM sent with no reply is not a conversation
@DonaldB has written:do think taking an image at iso 100 and iso 4000 of your kitchen is rocket science ? im glad im me. do you guys actually take test images ?
@DonaldB has written:back peddling are you both after your exposure triangle theory hit a brick wall ๐ i have so much more info would make you and Bobs head spin on the whole history of photography. You guys just preach everyone else's info without doing your own research.
@DonaldB has written:pisses me off more, i post a simple image and expect questions and answers related to my image . not some primary school crap all the time. is it so god dam hard to have a sensible conversation on this site without all the garbage thrown in ?
I can see how and where this is going, the very same games were played else where without much success.
Their is a great number of people that know much more than you with the topics being discussed here and it would be wise for you to take heed in their answers and that you should really stop this act that you seem so keen on playing.The majority of your post come across as derogatory and the attituded that you could never be wrong.
Even when someone mentions shot noise you could not even be bothered to do some research on the subject and play this game that everyone else is wrong.
This is really a never-ending story with you.
Even in your "Raw histogram and why does it matter" you play this game, in your discussion there you post a link to DPR on the use of RD and that everyone should look at the article, that article in a nutshells did not disagree with anything people was tell you here.The one person here who would be the one to setup test shots and understands what it takes to evaluate them has already let you know what he thinks of your testing methods
Ive offed and posted the raw link, not my problem if they are to g.............s to open them. in fear of retribution.
Even better ,lets see you 2 get out of this one now ๐คฃ what are the odds 1 person is going to ask for the raw files link ๐and post the conversions showing the shadow noise comparisons. that will be even more fun.
I don'T think anyone is going too, And I don't think you really know what points that your trying to make other than playing some stupid game