Scene luminance has nothing to do with exposure.

oh com on Dunno, has the cat got your shutter finger 😂😂😂

so how does 1 million divissions show highlight clipping greater or more accuratly than 10 😜

can blame it on the poor programming, that has built in default corrections.

He is proving you wrong again 🤣

I have posted images in several threads both here and on dpreview. Feel free to post comments or feedback on any of them 😄

You can jump up and down making a total fool of yourself proclaiming your Sony camera displays raw histograms but your false logic, findings and blatant lies have been proven on multiple occasions in multiple threads by multiple people.

I can guarantee you 100% that Sony engineers will also tell you your camera's histogram is not a raw histogram.

For a given scene your camera's histogram will vary according to the WB and colour space settings you set which proves your camera's histogram cannot possibly be a raw histogram.

You can blame it on the histogram being inaccurate and showing clipping where there is none.

come on danno post some test shots and histograms. but you cant can you you would rather hide and shoot from the chicken coupe instead of manning up at the front line.

Your false logic, findings and blatant lies have already been proven in multiple threads by multiple people so I have no need to provide further proof to what has already been posted.

I can guarantee you 100% that Sony engineers will also tell you your camera's histogram is not a raw histogram.

For a given scene your camera's histogram will vary according to the WB and colour space settings you set which proves your camera's histogram cannot possibly be a raw histogram.

I think you need to read up on instument / measurement resolution. surely you understand that ? 🤨 maybe not.

your stuttering again.

Nope, you keep repeating the same comments so I repeat the same replies 🤣🤣😎

It's a simple fact - the histogram shows clipping when there is none. You can blame it on whatever you want, the fact remains.

its not even up against the side its a white patch 😁😁😜no fall off

perfectly good raw exposure and camera histogram but here is the jpeg from camera.

Nope, there is a bit of data going up the right side of the histogram.

idiot

its got a dark pixel before the white pixel boarder. 😵‍💫😵‍💫

you must shoot with a handy man camera as well. not my problem

A histogram is a frequency count of either the individual rgb values (RGB histogram) or a frequency count of the luminosity of each pixel. Either way, the histogram data for "dark" pixels will be towards the left of the histogram.

On a histogram there is no way to tell where in the image any data point came from as shown in

What Is Happening Under The Histogram Hood

Or perhaps your image is just another example of your proven history of fudging images to suit the agenda you are pushing at the time 😁😁😎

Either way it doesn't matter because:

Your false logic, findings and blatant lies have already been proven in multiple threads by multiple people so I have no need to provide further proof to what has already been posted.

I can guarantee you 100% that Sony engineers will also tell you your camera's histogram is not a raw histogram.

For a given scene your camera's histogram will vary according to the WB and colour space settings you set which proves your camera's histogram cannot possibly be a raw histogram.