DPRevived & The Photo
  • Web Site
  • chevron_right Threads
  • label All Forums
  • label techniques Photographic Techniques
  • label B&W B&W and Monochrome Photography

Mystic Falls

larryj
April 5, 2023
chat_bubble_outline 5
  • link
    larryj
    Members 104 posts
    April 5, 2023, 12:52 a.m. April 5, 2023, 12:52 a.m.
    link

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/47811466702_86cee6365b_k.jpg

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/47811466702_86cee6365b_k.jpg

    Image taken in the lost village on the north island of New Zealand. Taken with a Rollieflex SL66 and the 50 mm lens.
    Film used was Panatomic-X. Negative was scanned and the DNG processed in Photoshop.

    smadayug, GreatBustard, Photobygms and 6 other users like this.

    favorite 9

  • link
    tprevatt
    Members 399 posts
    April 5, 2023, 3:06 a.m. April 5, 2023, 3:06 a.m.
    link

    Nice shot LarryJ. I used to love PanX in my Mamiya RB67.

  • link
    RokasM
    Members 61 posts
    April 5, 2023, 8:22 a.m. April 5, 2023, 8:22 a.m.
    link

    A nice place. The photo could be beautiful if not a technical defect. Why the author put on display a photo with “holes” and obvious posterization remains a mystery to me.

  • link
    TheDavinator
    Members 621 posts
    April 13, 2023, 3:05 p.m. April 13, 2023, 3:05 p.m.
    link

    I like the subject and composition…but the water is very blown out in the highlights. Is that on the negative as well. P32 is a bit unforgiving in high contrast scenes.

  • link
    WolfsHead
    Members 245 posts
    April 13, 2023, 3:16 p.m. April 13, 2023, 3:16 p.m.
    link

    I think it’s a very nice photo, but sadly, I have to agree that the blown highlights detract from it. You don’t mention anything about the scan - professional or home - but, depending on where the issue lies, it might be worth a rescan.

    For what it’s worth (nothing!) I used to use Ilford Pan F in either a Mamiya C330 or a Bronica EC with Nikon lenses. I scan those negs on an Epson flat bed scanner and am generally happy with the results.

  • link
    larryj
    Members 104 posts
    April 15, 2023, 11:16 p.m. April 15, 2023, 11:16 p.m.
    link

    Hello everyone I hear your comments and the problem was I was shooting in a dark cave and the only light was on the water at the back. The meter reading on the water at the back came out at 8 second at F:11. I shot one at the exposure at 8 seconds and a second at 16 sec at f:11 to compensate for the reciprocity effects in the film. The first exposure lost all detail in the ferns on the left and still washed out the water. I chose the second exposure because of the better detail in the ferns. The prints from the scans duplicated the prints made in the darkroom. I think the image is catchy even with it's flaws.

    tomm111, OregonDawg and TheDavinator like this.

    favorite 3

arrow_upward Go to top
  • DPRevived.com is owned and operated by The Photographer's Foundation Limited, registered in England, company number 14795583. Email: management@DPRevived.com
powered by misago