• Members 727 posts
    April 9, 2023, 12:30 p.m.

    Just put "ignore" and "complain" buttons.

  • Members 4254 posts
    April 9, 2023, 12:32 p.m.

    That by itself doesn't prove ownership at all.

    Are you not aware that it would take anyone who knows what they are doing about 5 minutes to download someone else's images and then falsify the exif data to make them look like they own the images?

  • April 9, 2023, 12:55 p.m.

    But a 'permaban' button would be much more fun!
    The 'complain' button is an invitation for bullying. And ignoring doesn't really need technological help. If you want to ignore someone, do it. Not very sociable, but your right.

  • April 9, 2023, 12:56 p.m.

    That's true. We could have instantaneous new account creation when you've been permabanned. Then it would really be like DPReview.

  • Members 54 posts
    April 9, 2023, 1:33 p.m.

    That's a great idea! Really. I'd add just one thing: append a special character like % plus a number to the account name, and increment the number every time a different member permabans them.

    Instant reputation indicator!

  • Members 153 posts
    April 9, 2023, 1:51 p.m.

    I never placed anyone on "Ignore" I found that very small minded. And the way to get around someone that placed me on Ignore, Leonard for example, was to post to someone that replied to his post, so then he saw mine. So funny, as he would feel compelled to reply to me through the 3rd party. Perfect solution for dealing with Leonard and his approved targets.

    And I feel the same way about the "complain" button. It would have to be extremely bad, like when RazorsharpWO, in a previous incarnation, pointed out he'd like to bash my head into concrete. I had a direct line to Thierry (almost) so just sent him a PM. RSWO was still an exceptional photographer, so since I didn't "Ignore" poor photographers, of which there were many, I sure wasn't going to "Ignore" him

  • Members 727 posts
    April 9, 2023, 2:36 p.m.

    If you did not use it, does not mean nobody did. If I found somebody's posts mostly nonsensical, insulating or just of no interest to me, I just do not want to waste my time reading them or even have them show up on my screen. YMMV. BTW to call small minded somebody who does what you do not isn't a good manner. Also do you think everybody knows who Thierry is?

  • Members 54 posts
    April 9, 2023, 2:44 p.m.

    If all the 'complain' button does is raise a flag no one else can see to get a mod's attention to a post, it's ineffective for bullying and used carelessly makes a mod more likely to ignore (not 'ignore') future complaints from that poster. A mod might not read every post in every thread in their forum.

  • April 9, 2023, 2:45 p.m.

    A long time ago on a far distant forum, I was engaged in a discussion in which my interlocutor was vehemently opposed to my point of view. It was one of several such discussions with this individual. In one post he announced that he was 'coming to get me with some friends'. Over the next few days he announced that he was at locations closer and closer to where I live. Finally he posted a Google map, with the tag on the premises of a photographer who shares my name and has a studio in the city where I worked at the time. I emailed the photographer a warning, just in case it was anything more than scare tactics, and resolved that there is only so much people should have to disclose on public web sites.
    As a side note, I notified the moderators repeatedly during this whole process. They ignored my notifications.

  • Members 273 posts
    April 9, 2023, 2:47 p.m.

    What you have is a report button and moderators only look at posts that have a whole bunch of reports.

  • Members 284 posts
    April 9, 2023, 2:51 p.m.

    Why do you keep promoting that site here? Stop with the spam please.

  • Members 621 posts
    April 9, 2023, 2:55 p.m.

    I’m finding the perception of some to be interesting. The only spots on DPRevived that I could even categorize is approaching heated would be right here in the few threads about moderation. I would say that is to be expected because DPReview stifled comment and opinion on how to best moderate a forum by deleting posts and banning users who even gave a hint at questioning those mods with a Napoleon complex. Finally, everyone is able to offer their own input.

    For the rest of the forum here, I have seen good interaction and if anything, people grateful for having this site develop and be open to new ideas. DPRevived has obviously, at least so far, become the destination of choice…and I don’t believe it for a minute that it is because, as some on DPReview suggest…that it is because all the troublemakers came here.

    55F0E7B3-E09B-4A79-A7FD-9D6A712D619A.jpeg

    55F0E7B3-E09B-4A79-A7FD-9D6A712D619A.jpeg

    JPG, 443.9 KB, uploaded by TheDavinator on April 9, 2023.

  • Members 153 posts
    April 9, 2023, 3:14 p.m.

    I am well aware that people used it, and I called them small minded for doing so. My opinion. I sincerely doubt that your time is so valuable that you couldn't simply stroll pass anything that was a hinderance to you. My opinion is 1. If your time is so valuable, you wouldn't have been on DPReview in the first place. and 2. Everyone, no matter how diametrically opposed they may be from you, there's likely a valuable piece of information somewhere in their posts.

    I know who Thierry is.

  • Members 727 posts
    April 9, 2023, 4:44 p.m.

    That is exactly what I am talking about. Calling people names. Disrespect people by saying that if they are on DP Review, their time is not valuable. And I am not against opinion diametrically opposed from mine. I've never said that. You are just twisting my words. I am done with this discussion.

  • April 9, 2023, 5:10 p.m.

    People,

    Once again, please review your posts before you enter them and, if they appear to contain disparaging remarks against people, then can you think again before posting it?

    Alan

  • Members 369 posts
    April 9, 2023, 5:34 p.m.

    Stany, there are good reasons a person chooses to be anonymous on a public forum. One is that anonymity gives a person more control over the amount of personal interaction they have with other members. Another, is that a person may feel less exposed to harassment by remaining anonymous. Anonymity can allow a person having a prominent public profile to be active without drawing attention based solely on that profile. A person may choose to be anonymous because they're seeking a fresh start.

    There are any number of legitimate reasons a member may choose to remain anonymous. As long as they don't engage in harassing behavior themselves, what's the harm?

  • Members 45 posts
    April 9, 2023, 5:48 p.m.

    Agree! Would not like to do that.

  • April 9, 2023, 6:43 p.m.

    I was an active member of dpreview for 19 years and enjoyed the discussions, even though many members disagreed with each other. On rare occasions brought bad behaviour to the attention of the moderators. This was dealt with appropriately and swiftly. I never had the above-reported impressions of the moderators -- until after the announcement of the closure of the site, since when it has been apparent that even mildly critical postings, although politely expressed, are vigorously pursued and annihilated. I myself did not understand this attitude, but it caused me to stop using the site immediately it became clear to me.

    David