Have You Ever Photographed Something You Can't Explain?

Exactly!
I have theory - if one cannot explain what one knows well, then one doesn't know it so well, after all...

If you have understood my drawings and explanations so far, let me know; then I'll continue later today with more complex situation.
If not, then just ask over.

I hope it is nothing serious!

But well, let's continue.
To recall most important claims and conclusions so far, for fluid or gaseous environment in static conditions:

• our 'tiny forces' are caused by chaotic, non-directional movement and can thereby drawn as ✴, not ↗ or ↙ or something else with clear direction
• without external forces (gravity) we can replace any part of our environment with some solid object, this does not change any forces in surrounding environment

Now we will introduce gravity, first without any additional objects or real walls in our environment (boundaries between 'cells' are again purely imaginary).

As you can see, there appeared additional force to our tiny water droplet - bluish arrow on picture. Similar forces, caused by gravity, apply of course to all other 'cells' too.
But we have condition that our model has to be static - this means that we must have some other force(s), balancing gravitational one. As there are no more 'big' forces, then apparently our 'tiny forces' need to be reconfigure itself in some way - in lower part of our droplet they need to be stronger (water molecules need to kick harder). As our forces are in form ✴ and symmetrical (otherwise water would start to flow into other directions, which is excluded by static nature of our model), then we can first conclude that they are equal at the same level (at same gravitational potential) and then that applying gravity creates 'tiny forces' gradient in entire environment, aligned in directon of gravity.
As you can see on image, 'tiny' forces at lower level are drawn as longer arrows. Of course if our cell is tiny, then real forces differ much less - but they are certainly different.

Although some words are explicitly forbidden here 🙃, I will anyway note that those non-directional ✴ forces are called pressure. Previous claim can also be reworded as "applying gravity to fluidous/gaseous environment creates pressure gradient".

I should have guessed that 🙃
You inverted my assumption - remember, we have static situation and we need to find out, what happens then.

But well, let's confine our water somehow - like I said many postings ago, to hold water in place we have to put some walls somewhere. Like on next image:

Now we have perfectly bottled water, gravity is vertical, our tiny droplet is also located there (my previous model is just magnification of it).
I did not draw forces at water-bottle surface, but they are reaction forces to water molecules, similar situation we have talked before.
I won't explain what happens at the top surface of water - this is very different topic.

By orange lines I have marked levels, where tiny ✴ forces (pressure) have to be equal.
Can you explain, why? In few words, to not hurt your finger :)

For given tiny cell it is correct. A bit more generally - molecules below some water volume need to counteract to weight of 'upper' molecules; they would gladly move away - but there is nowhere to go, molecules in the neighbourhood have similar 'pressure' from upper ones and then we have walls, which don't go away. 'Lower' molecules thereby just need to kick harder (= exert bigger force) to keep situation stable.

Then we claim that ✴ forces on same level are equal.
Remember that the only external force (gravity) is vertical, there is no horizontal component of it - this implies that forces cancel out in horizontal direction or in other words, they are just equal. Or in prohibited :) words - pressure at the same level is equal.
(Wikipedia calls related principle as 'Communicating vessels'.)

This holds even in strange geometric forms, like our bottle above - pressure at a level, marked by orange line, is equal in all three areas.

Can we use the word pressure for our tiny ✴ forces from now or should I continue to avoid that?
I mean do you start seeing pressure as a result of omnidirectional (molecular) forces or not yet?
Few posts ago you attempted to assign direction to pressure, this is not possible in our static fluid or gaseous environment - I hope you have changed your mind :)

(I'm really not a teacher kind of person.)