but we are looking at images made from microscope objectives with extremely fine detail. read the olympus imaging link a poster had provided. you want the best image quality use a larger sensor. but under most curcomstances good enough is good enough.
June 30, 2023
92
-
-
I've been writing some of my own stacking software, so I can control that.
-
only under common circumstances. thats why i chose the a74 over the a7r4 or a7r5 .as i shoot low light concerts and bigger pixels produce cleaner images.
-
Magic.
-
Why the "but"? The point is maximizing the detail captured. Finer pitch is a win here, until diffraction is the long pole in the tent.
-
-
left large pixels right smaller pixels.
-
on a stacked 100 shot image detail is much cleaner.
-
less pixel bleeding
-
which is what we are discussing Diffraction limited also pixel bleeding, noise control. larger pixels win on all 3 . stack those 3 items 100 times and you get a less cleaner less detailed image from smaller pixels.
-
Please define what you mean.
-
Then I've got a camera for you:
blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/sloof-lirpa-announces-high-dynamic-range-camera/
-
classic case see the flys eyes are good but there is even finer detail that the m43 sensor cant resolve.
-
Why do you call it pixel bleeding period?
-
sounds like computational photography. i have no problem with DR. do i spent $1500 on a new microscope objective or keep what i have is my delemma atm 😁
-
[deleted]
-
Did you notice the date of the post?
